Manual Testing vs Automated Testing Difference - Choose the Best

Table of Contents [show]

Manual testing means people test and use software to find problems, while automated testing uses computer programs or scripts to create and run tests automatically. The upcoming article will focus on manual testing vs automated testing in detail. We will also cover which concept is more vital rather than the other one.

What is Manual Testing and Automation Testing?

Before jumping further, you should know about both concepts. As a result, it will be helpful to you when you require the difference between manual and automation testing. First, we will comprehend about the manual testing. After that, we will discover the next one.

Understanding Manual Testing

Manual testing means people test software without using any automatic tools. It ensures all the parts of the software work like they're supposed to, according to the plan. Because no advanced tools are used, manual testing can be slow, repetitive, expensive, and take a lot of time. Manual testing is significant for tasks where humans need it. For instance, when we need to check if a product is easy for people to use, we do User Acceptance testing. As a result, it is a type of manual testing where real people try out the product before it goes out for everyone.

Manual testing happens when we need human input to see how well the software works for users. Let's look at an example to see how Manual Testing happens in real life.

Working of Manual Testing

Suppose a person makes a website and wants you to check if the login works. You should be able to type in your username and password, then click 'Login' to get in. If clicking 'Login' doesn’t take you where it should, you tell the person who made the website.

Here are the steps for testing:
 

• First, open the web browser.
• After that, go to the website.
• Then, find the login page.
• Next, type in your username and password.
• Further, tell if something doesn’t work.

Manual testing like this can take a long time. After understanding the working of manual testing, you can effortlessly know which manual vs automation testing is better.

Benefits of Manual Testing

Manual testing has some advantages about it:
 

• Easy to hire: Anyone can do manual testing, so it is easy to find people for the job.
• Quick feedback: Manual testing gives feedback quickly and accurately.
• Accessible in many cases: Manual tests can be used for different situations.
• Adaptable: It's easy for manual testing to change when the software looks different.
• Costs less: Manual testing doesn't need expensive tools, so it's cheaper.
   

Here, we understand the merits of performing the manual testing. Further, we will discuss the concepts regarding automated testing. As a result, when you show the manual testing and automation testing difference, it will clear all your doubts.

What is Automated Testing?

Automation testing uses advanced frameworks to run tests. These frameworks have scripts that tell them how to test the software. They include things like:
 

• Libraries for functions
• Sources for test data
• Details about objects
• Other parts that can be used again
   

Choosing the appropriate automation framework is essential because it can make testing faster and cheaper. Depending on what a business needs, the framework can be set up in different ways, like being very organized, using a lot of data, or being adaptable. The framework gives the tools for automation testing to work well. Furthermore, we will discuss the prominent concept- manual testing vs automated testing.

Working of Automated Testing

When companies use Test Automation, they use a framework with rules, ways of working, and tools for testing. A reliable Automation Framework has rules for writing code, ways to handle test data, places to keep test results, and ways to use other tools. Depending on the framework, tests are run and recorded.
 

For example:
 

• A simple framework works well for small apps but can't reuse scripts.
• Modular frameworks split scripts into smaller parts to avoid repeating work but take time to set up.
• Data-driven frameworks help make tests that work with different data, testing more things with fewer tests.
• Keyword-driven frameworks let testers create tests using simple keywords, which is reasonable for testers who aren't programmers.
• Hybrid frameworks mix different methods to get the best of each.

Manual Testing vs Automated Testing

While the primary difference between manual and automated testing is simple, many ways are there to explain those differences.

 

Why Automation Testing is Better than Manual?

Doing more testing in less time is the most prominent advantage of automation testing. It helps you test more things quickly, which boosts productivity. Why choose automation testing over manual testing? Mainly because it's faster. Manual testing takes a lot of time, and as software needs have grown, automation has become necessary to keep up and release products faster.
 

Automation testing cuts down on repetitive tasks. Although it needs manual work to set up initially, it saves time in the long run because test scripts can be reused. These scripts are written in code like Java, JavaScript, Python, or C#. Automation tools have advanced a lot. They can now do complex tests like simulating real users, testing features like Face ID or location, and checking for errors in images or voice commands. Automated testing also covers more tests compared to manual testing. It can check more device types and operating systems, which means better error detection.
 

Here, we have mentioned why automated testing is far better than manual testing. Further, we will elaborate on the advantages of utilizing automated testing over manual testing. Moreover, after learning all the concepts, you can effortlessly know manual testing vs automated testing.

Our Learners Also Reads: What is Marketing Automation - Know Its Importance and Working

Advantages of Automation Testing Over Manual

The following section will describe some pros of using Automated testing. 
 

• Efficiency: Automated testing is faster and helps run more tests in less time. As a result, it boosts productivity, especially with the rise of smart devices and apps.
• Cost-effective: While manual testing needs lots of human effort every time, automation has a one-time cost. It's cheaper in the long run.
• Accuracy: Automated tests are more precise because they follow set rules and give consistent results, unlike manual testing, which can have human errors.
• Reusable Tests: Automation lets you reuse tests easily, making it easier to test different parts of the software.
• Scalability: Automation scales well, needing only more test executors, unlike manual testing, which needs more people and time for each project.
• Reduced Manual Work: Automation cuts down repetitive tasks, although some manual work is needed to set it up initially.
• Advanced Testing: Automation can handle advanced tests like face ID or location testing.
• More Test Coverage: Automation can test more things thoroughly, improving software quality.

Further, we will discuss the difference between manual and automation testing. 

Conclusion

Deciding between manual and automated testing depends on things like the type of tests, what the project needs, how much money is available, and the skills of the testing team. Using both manual and automated testing together when needed can make testing faster and better. In short, the above-mentioned guide has detailed your manual testing vs automated testing. You can opt for accordingly.